Recent Focused Series »

Indo-European Origins
Siberia
Northern California
The Caucasus
Imaginary Geography
Home » Cultural Geography, Genetics, Population Geography, Religion, Sub-Saharan Africa

Are the Black Jews Jewish?

Submitted by on July 3, 2012 – 5:44 pm 46 Comments |  
The South African University of KwaZulu-Natal has recently hosted a conference on black Judaism around the globe, with a special emphasis on black Jews in Africa. The conference was attended by academics from Israel, France, Congo, UK and the US, including Professor Shalva Weil, a renowned anthropologist from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem who chairs the Society for the Study of Ethiopian Jewry. Weil told The Jerusalem Post that she was pleased to participate, especially after the university canceled a lecture by an Israeli diplomat a few weeks earlier.

Also among the participants was Dr. Edith Bruder, a professor at the French national research institute who studies the so-called Igbo Jews of Nigeria, a  40,000-strong segment of the mostly Christian Igbo people, who number 15 to 30 million. Bruder claim that the group adopted Judaism before the arrival of the Portuguese in the 15th century. This theory is, however, highly controversial, as the Igbo people speak a Niger-Congo language and used to follow their traditional Igbo religion. Igbo Jewish religious practices include circumcision eight days after the birth of a male child, observance of kosher dietary laws, separation of men and women during menstruation, wearing of the tallit (prayer shawl) and kippah (cap), and the celebration of holidays such as Yom Kippur and Rosh Hashanah. In recent times, Igbo Jewish communities have also adopted holidays such as Hanukkah and Purim, which were instituted only after the diaspora. However, the State of Israel has not officially recognized the Igbo as a “Lost Tribe.”

Another African group that claims Israelite origin is the Yibir, a small clan in Somalia, whose numbers are estimated anywhere between 1,300 and 25,000. Much like the Gypsies in Europe, the elusive Yibir people subsist mostly as itinerant soothsayers and magicians. They speak a local Somali language, and like the Somali population in general, overwhelmingly adhere to Islam; few of them know anything about Judaism. However, authors such as Christian Bader hold the Yibir to be descendants of Israelites and derive their name from the word for “Hebrew”. According to Professor Weil, such tribes are not recognized by Israel as Jews.

Other Black Israelite groups that are not recognized as Jewish by Orthodox Judaism include the Abayudaya of Uganda and the House of Israel Community in Ghana. The name Abayudaya translates from the Luganda language as “People of Judah”, analogous to Children of Israel. This community of approximately 1,100 subsistence farmers lives near the town of Mbale in Uganda. Prior to the persecutions of the Idi Amin regime, their numbers were closer to 3,000. Although the Abayudaya are not genetically or historically related to ethnic Jews, they are devout in their practice of the religion, keeping their version of kashruth, and observing Shabbat. They are also well-known for a particular style of music and singing. In Ghana, the House of Israel Community claim descent from one of the Ten Lost Tribes of Israel, but they too are not recognized as Jewish by mainstream Judaism. This community was evidently established in antiquity through migrations into western Africa by Jewish traders, merchants, and others, which are documented by Arab, Jewish, and European travelers and historians. These migrations crossed the Sahara desert into Mali, where there has been a documented Jewish community in Timbuktu (this community has long ceased to exist due to migration and assimilation). From Mali, Jewish migration continued though the Ivory Coast and into Ghana. For centuries, Ghanaian Jews observed such customs as avoidance of pork, observance of a day of rest on Saturdays, male circumcision eight days after birth, and the separation of man and woman during female menstruation. In the late 20th century, the Jewish community in Ghana has established ties to worldwide Jewry.

The two best-known groups of Black Jews are Beta Israel of Ethiopia and Lemba of Zimbabwe. Beta Israel, also known as Falasha, is a community of more than 130,000 people. They too claim descent from one of Ten Lost Tribes, namely that of Dan. By now, nearly 85% of the Ethiopian Beta Israel community has emigrated to Israel, mostly during two rescue operations: Operation Moses in 1984 and Operation Solomon in 1991. The Falasha are not to be confused with the Falasha Mura, who are the descendants of Ethiopian Jews who converted to Christianity. Some members of this group now returning to the practices of Judaism, but their status is very controversial in Israel today. Some people even doubt that Falasha proper are truly Jewish. Unsurprisingly, a number of genetic studies have been conducted to clarify the status of the Falasha people. Already in the early 1990s, an examination of Y-DNA and mtDNA of Ethiopian Jews, conducted by a team headed by Batsheva Bonne-Tamir (Zoossmann-Disken et al. 1991), found that:

“Ethiopian Jews cluster with other Ethiopian tribes and occupy a central position on a principal component map between African and Asian populations.”

A further study by Lucotte & Smets (1999) came to a similar conclusion. Although the authors do not doubt the Jewish practices of Falasha, they dispute their claim of descent from the tribe of Dan:

“… the distinctiveness of the Y-chromosome haplotype distribution of Beta Israel Jews from conventional Jewish populations and their relatively greater similarity in haplotype profile to non-Jewish Ethiopians are consistent with the view that the Beta Israel people descended from ancient inhabitants of Ethiopia who converted to Judaism.”

Similarly, a later study by Bonne-Tamir’s team (Hammer et al. 2000) found Beta Israel to be an exception to the general commonality of the “paternal gene pools of Jewish communities from Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East descended from a common Middle Eastern ancestral population”. Their conclusion is that the Falasha are “affiliated more closely with non-Jewish Ethiopians and other North Africans”.

But in 2001, an interesting twist appeared in the story of the Falasha: a study by the Department of Biological Sciences at Stanford University found a possible genetic link between eleven Ethiopian Jews and four Yemenite Jews. So are Ethiopian Jews related to other Jewish groups worldwide by blood after all? Probably not: the more likely explanation proposed by the Stanford researchers is a historical flow of  genes flow between Ethiopian and Yemenite Jewish populations, or perhaps even between Jewish and non-Jewish populations of both regions. Thus, it is not that the eleven Ethiopian Jews studied are related to other Jews by blood, but rather that the four Yemenite Jews are related to Ethiopians; perhaps they are descendents of reverse migrants of African origin who crossed the Red Sea from Ethiopia to Yemen.

All the abovementioned studies examined Y-DNA, which traces paternal descent. But since in most forms of Judaism today maternal lineage is crucial in determining one’s Jewishness, a more recent study, reported in Thomas et al. (2002) looked at the mtDNA of Ethiopian Jews. According to their results, the most common mtDNA type found among the Ethiopian Jewish sample was present only in Somalia, which further supports the view that most Ethiopian Jews are of local, Ethiopian origin.

Another fascinating Jewish group in Africa is the Lemba, or Lembaa, who number 50,000-70,000 in Zimbabwe, Malawi, and the South African region of Venda. According to their legends, Lemba ancestors came by boat from a northern town called Sena. It is not entirely clear where that legendary town is located as towns with similar names abound in Israel, Egypt, Ethiopia, and Yemen, but the latter seems the most likely possibility (see map). Unlike Ethiopian and Yemenite Jews who speak Semitic languages distantly related to Hebrew, the Lemba are speakers of Bantu languages closely related to those spoken by their neighbors. Historically, the Lemba had various religious practices and beliefs similar to those in Judaism, which have been transmitted orally through the generations. Today, many Lemba are Christians, though they seem to maintain several Jewish-like practices such as observance of a holy day of rest similar to the Jewish Shabbat, considering themselves a chosen people, and practicing male circumcision. The Lemba also refrain from eating pork or other foods or food combinations forbidden by the Torah; they also practice a form of animal slaughter, which makes meats fit for their consumption (resembling the Jewish Shechita). Lemba tombstones are decorated with Stars of David. Like other Jewish groups, Lemba encourage endogamy and have specific conversion practices for non-Lembas. Although the Lemba themselves claim descent from one of the Lost Tribes, there are two alternative explanations for their adherence to these Jewish practices: first, the Lemba might have read parts of the Hebrew Bible and adopted some of the practices; second, they may have absorbed Jewish traditions from traders on the east coast of Africa.

A number of genetic studies have been conducted on the Lemba. In 1996, Spurdle & Jenkins showed that more than 50% of the Lemba Y-DNA is Semitic in origin, approximately 40% is sub-Saharan African, and the ancestry of the remainder cannot be resolved. Perhaps surprisingly, a parallel study of mtDNA exhibited a very different pattern: practically no evidence of female ancestry from the Middle East can be found, as the female forebears of the Lemba were overwhelmingly African. Such findings indicate that the Lemba descend from the intermarriage of Semitic—though not necessarily Jewish—males and local African women.

A further study by Thomas et al. (2000) showed that a substantial number of Lemba men carry a particular polymorphism on the Y-chromosome known as the Cohen Modal Haplotype (CMH). This genetic signature is associated with Jewish lineages that trace their descent from the priests, known as cohanim in Hebrew. According to the Jewish tradition, these men are direct male descendants of the Biblical Aaron, the older brother of Moses. (While many of the Cohanim bear last names like Cohen, Kogan, Katz, and the like, the correlation between the last name and whether a given man is a cohen is far from perfect). Curiously, the priestly sub-clan within the Lemba, the Buba, carries most of the CMH found in the ethnic group. However, another study has shown that some 34% of men in Yemen also exhibit close similarity to CMH, despite being found not to be closely related when more microsatellite markers are taken into account. Therefore, a larger number microsatellite markers would need to be tested in order to verify whether the Lemba Y-DNA is indeed derived from Jewish cohanim rather than other possible Semitic ancestors.

The various groups discussed above raise intense debates in Israel and elsewhere as to who counts as a Jew. According to the halakhic (Jewish religious) definition, a person is Jewish if his or her mother is Jewish, or if he or she converts to Judaism. Israel’s Law of Return originally applied to Jews defined in that way, but in 1970 the Jewish Ancestry Amendment was adopted, extending “the rights of a Jew under [the Law of Return]… [to] a child and a grandchild of a Jew, the spouse of a Jew, the spouse of a child of a Jew and the spouse of a grandchild of a Jew”—essentially, anyone who would be persecuted under the Nuremberg Laws. For groups that claim descent from one of the Ten Lost Tribes, the presumed connection to the rest of the Jewish people is through male rather female lineage, and for groups such as Abayudaya a religious conversion at some point in history is assumed. Yet Orthodox Judaism and the State of Israel remain wary of the groups that claim to be Jewish but have no genetic links to other ethnic Jews.

 

Sources:

Bader, Christian (2000). Yibro (les) mages somali. Paris.

Hammer M. F., Redd A. J., Wood E. T., Bonner M. R., Jarjanazi H., Karafet T., Santachiara-Benerecetti S., Oppenheim A., Jobling M. A., Jenkins T., Ostrer H., Bonné-Tamir B. (2000) “Jewish and Middle Eastern non-Jewish populations share a common pool of Y-chromosome biallelic haplotypes”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 97 no. 12, pp. 6769-6774.

Lucotte G, Smets P. (1999) “Origins of Falasha Jews studied by haplotypes of the Y chromosome”. Human Biology 71(6): 989-93.

Thomas et al. (2000) “Y Chromosomes Traveling South: The Cohen Modal Haplotype and the Origins of the Lemba—the “Black Jews of Southern Africa””. American Journal of Human Genetics 66 (2): 674.

Thomas, Mark G.; Michael E. Weale, Abigail L. Jones, Martin Richards, Alice Smith, Nicola Redhead, Antonio Torroni, Rosaria Scozzari, Fiona Gratrix, Ayele Tarekegn, James F. Wilson, Cristian Capelli, Neil Bradman, and David B. Goldstein. (2002) “Founding Mothers of Jewish Communities: Geographically Separated Jewish Groups Were Independently Founded by Very Few Female Ancestors”. American Journal of Human Genetics 70(6): 1411-1420.

Zoossmann-Diskin A, Ticher A, Hakim I, Goldwitch Z, Rubinstein A, Bonne-Tamir B. (1991) “Genetic affinities of Ethiopian Jews”. Israel Journal of Medical Sciences 27(5): 245-51.

Previous Post
«
Next Post
»

Subscribe For Updates

It would be a pleasure to have you back on GeoCurrents in the future. You can sign up for email updates or follow our RSS Feed, Facebook, or Twitter for notifications of each new post:
        

Commenting Guidelines: GeoCurrents is a forum for the respectful exchange of ideas, and loaded political commentary can detract from that. We ask that you as a reader keep this in mind when sharing your thoughts in the comments below.

  • http://blog.zolnai.ca/ Andrew Zolnai

    Asya love you erudition as usual, but this gave me pause about anthropology: I was for National Day in the outskirts of Manama, Bahrain early 2002 in the Heritage Village, where a fishing village and village square were recreated to show traditional lifestyles. There were also singing and dancing performances, and in the evening throngs of families went our into the cooling air. What struck me however was that there was a gaunt gentleman with aquiline sharp features associated with local semitic type (both Jewish and Arabic), and his skin was pitch black. Next to him was a more rotund man with round face, thick lips and tight curly hair associated with negroid type (I hope I say this correctly), but his skin was almost as fair as mine (I’m light olivish Magyar type and never sunburn). I suppose that racial intermixing in the heavily trading Gulf States must be pretty prevalent…

    • http://www.pereltsvaig.com Asya Pereltsvaig

      Indeed. Some of the African Jewish communities must have arose through intermarriage at traditing outposts, but others claim descent from the “Lost Ten Tribes”, and it is these latter claims that are particularly interesting. But clearly if everyone who claims such descent is truly related to the Tribes, there should be many more than 10.

  • Ryan Lord

    Aaron is the older brother of Moses. I feel needlessly pedantic pointing this out, sorry.

    Also if you’re going to claim to be a member of a particular tribe the Danites seems like an odd choice.

    Fascinating article as always. Sadly the discussion about haplotypes and what not always goes straight over my head.

    • CelestialChoir

      You might want to check out other articles on the Benei-Israel of Nigeria, also known as Igbo/Ibo. Apparently their oral histories contain mention of being descended from Gad, Dan, Zevulun, Manasseh and Asher. Some of these articles mention some of the Igbos also testing positive for the CMH (Cohen Modal Haplotype), the genetic marker linking Cohanim/Levites across many peoples from different countries. Many of us African-americans (60% or more) , Afro-latinos
      and Afro-caribbeans are also of Igbo descent, in addition to other African Hebrew
      peoples. When all the genome research becomes increasingly refined and published, there will probably be many more genetic links to the ancient Hebrew/Jewish/Israelite populations identified and confirmed.

      • http://www.pereltsvaig.com Asya Pereltsvaig

        Yes, I did discuss the Igbo Jews in the post. The CMH by itself is not conclusive though, as some non-Jews seem to have it as well, due to gene flow most probably.

        It would be interesting to know if any traces of that Jewish/CMH signatures show up in African Americans (in a significant way). Do you know anything about that?

        • CelestialChoir

           As genetic testing by African-americans is a relatively recent phenomenon (within the last decade or so), I do not know if there is enough awareness to test for the CHM or varieties of haplotype. Most of us typically use genetic testing to establish which African groups share our ancestry, and also what are the percentages of our admixture with European and Native American genes.
          I am in touch with a Nigerian Jewish researcher, who has mentioned that some of the Nigerian Igbo population has this
          marker; however, without having huge numbers of people tested,
          it will be impossible to determine how this marker is found in certain families, or clan groups or geographic regions within Nigeria. The same would be true for Igbo-descended populations in the New World; we would need extensive testing/gene mapping in Black populations in the Americas and the Caribbean. I suspect that certain areas would have “clusters” of family groups or clans in which both the CHM and/or other “Semitic” genetic material
          would be present in greater amounts, depending upon where the family ancestry is located, how much this family had or had not
          shared genes with OTHER families, and/or how much genetic “drift” had marked their stay in the New World over time.

          • http://www.pereltsvaig.com Asya Pereltsvaig

            Thank you for sharing this, CelestialChoir! Very interesting subject indeed, and “more research is needed”.

          • CelestialChoir

             I believe you can find the stuff on Dr. Oz and the two Jewish men–Mike Nichols and Einstein–on the 23andme.com website and/or the “Faces of
            America” website. I believe the test resulted in all three men having the same male ancestor.

          • J Heald

            The video of the TV programme is a bit sketchy, as is the material online; but from the commentary that the men’s paternal line was found to come from the same “haplogroup”, it sounds as if they turned out to be from the Y-DNA Haplogroup J1, or perhaps its parent group Haplogroup J.

            The mutation that defines Haplogroup J probably occurred in the region of 30,000 years ago. It’s the most common Y-DNA haplogroup right across the Middle East, and also very common in North Africa and India. (See eg the map on its Wikipedia article).

            It’s therefore not particularly surprising to find it both in a man of Turkish descent and a man of Jewish descent.

            The programme was slightly disingenuous, I thought, in connecting the proposed common ancestor with a Biblical tale. 30,000 years ago is much much older than Biblical times; the fact is that this haplogroup is and has been very common throughout the region, going back a long time.

        • CelestialChoir

           Ooops…forgot to mention…just for reference…my research interest lies in the genetic links to ancient/modern populations of Hebrews/Israelites/Jews and the shared genetic ancestry with
          African and African-descent populations.

          • http://www.pereltsvaig.com Asya Pereltsvaig

            Thank you for sharing your background and for joining in the discussion. This is a very intereting angle that I didn’t even think of when I wrote this article.

          • CelestialChoir

             Could you explain a little more about how a “non-Jewish” group could have the CMH? As this marker is known to exist only within groups claiming ancestry with Levites/Cohens, how could the group not be “genetically Jewish”? (Remember that I’m not using halachic/religious standards
            or sociocultural definitions–just looking at the
            DNA patterns.) For example, I saw a YouTube video of Dr. Oz (who’s “Turkish”) and a “Jewish”
            man, who both had shared genes. Dr. Oz was
            taken aback–although the “Jewish” guest was
            not. If the genetic ancestry is the same, how
            is Dr. Oz NOT “Jewish” in the genetic sense?

          • J Heald

            It’s simply not true that the CMH is known to exist “only within groups claiming ancestry from Levites/Cohens”.

            That might have been an assumption when the first tests were done on the Lemba, at a times when the presence or absence of the CMH had really only been tested for in Jewish groups.

            However, it is now known that there are different groups with the CMH all over the Middle East, unrelated to each other unless you go back 15,000 years. The Lemba CMH might have come from *any* of these groups, not necessarily the Jewish Cohens.

            It is worth remembering that the CMH is *not* an SNP-type mutation, of the kind likely to have occurred once and once only in the whole history of humanity, defining a single group of descendents.

            Instead, the CMH refers to a small number of STR values — a different type of genetic marker, the values of which can float about increasing or decreasing over the generations.

            The CMH signature is thought to be close to the values possessed by the original ancestor of Haplotype J yDNA, about 15,000 to 25,000 years ago. Most Haplotype J descendents now have STR values which have drifted slightly away from this. But there are some lineages where, simply by random chance, those changes have happened to other STR markers than the six considered in the earliest tests, so they still match the pattern of 15,000 years ago. Research shows that about 30% of Jewish Kohens are very very closely related, with a pattern of these 6 STRs that matches the CMH. But it is now known that there are also other descendent groups, all over the Middle East, who *also* still happen to match the CMH. The CMH signature the Lemba have could have come from any of them.

            What is needed is to now look at *other* STR markers and see what their values are. (Anything up to 120 markers are now routinely used by genetic genealogists, compared to only 6 in the original studies). This would give the much more detailed signature to know for sure which group the Lemba inherited their 6-marker CMH pattern from; and whether they really are closely related to the Jewish Cohens, or not.

            Unfortunately, there seems to be an enormous reluctance to do such (now relatively commonplace) higher resolution tests to shed more light on this — perhaps for fear of risking what has become a somewhat lucrative proposition, this inferred Cohen/Lemba connection.

          • http://www.pereltsvaig.com Asya Pereltsvaig

            As I mentioned in another post, there is no specific signature that identifies a person as certainly Jewish or certainly not Jewish:

            http://geocurrents.info/place/europe/hungarys-rising-hyper-nationalist-jobbik-party-and-the-legacy-of-anti-semitism-and-anti-gypsyism

            When it comes to both individuals and groups, CMH, which is just a small part of one’s Y-DNA code, suggests connections to other groups, but some amount of CMH in a non-Jewish group is perfectly possible through gene flow from a Jewish group. To say that a person with CMH is Jewish no matter what implies the “one drop” assumption, which to me is more political than scientific. Also, see J Heald’s additional remarks below.

    • http://www.pereltsvaig.com Asya Pereltsvaig

      My bad, yes, older. I will fix the post accordingly. Thank you.

      Why do you say that the Danites is an odd choice?

      Hopefully, reading more about haplotypes and what not on GeoCurrents will make this materials less opaque for you.

  • David Schwartz

    Interesting to read and it will be interesting to see what Israel decided to do in regards to the rest of these groups.  Its always fascinating to see how religions that have a ethnic component to them seem to get around much farther than one would normally suspect.  Along with these African Jews, other non-semitic Jewish populations are fascinating to examine such as the Khazars and any other group with similar practices (I can’t think of any).

    • http://www.pereltsvaig.com Asya Pereltsvaig

      Thank you, I am very pleased that this article aroused such resonance!

      You are absolutely right in saying that “it will be interesting to see what Israel decided to do in regards to the rest of these groups”. Of course, the whole issue is also tied to the question of whether Orthodox Judaism will remain the only (official) kind of Judaism in Israel, or whether Reform and Conservative Judaism will gain more of a niche there. Also, the topic of Black/African Jews is connected in many people’s minds to the issue of (illegal) African immigrants in Israel, which has recently been high on the news radar. So none of this is straightforward.

      As for other Jewish but non-Semitic groups, I might do another post on Jews of India later on (there are several distinct groups!), and of course the topic of Khazars is fascinating to consider more closely also.

      • David Schwartz

        Please continue this theme I find it fascinating, but I don’t want to deny other groups their turn to be examined.  

        Another part of Jewish history (among many) that I find interesting is the late 19th century/early 20th century transition in Europe where we see both the rise of the political Zionist movement and a assimilationist  movement where Jews started to identify with the the Nations they lived in and desired to be part of the populations of them.  This movemnt coexisted and even conflicted at times until you get to WW2 and the Holocaust.  It’s interesting to see  since you have the early migrations to Palestine at roughly the same time  as Benjamin Disraeli is the PM of Great Britain.  

        Which actually brings up an interesting question of how the Indian Jewish populations were treated under the Disraeli government?

        • http://www.pereltsvaig.com Asya Pereltsvaig

          Thank you, David. I am definitely adding the Jews of India to my list of future topics. I don’t know much on how the Indian Jewish populations were treated under the Disraeli government, as I’ve not seen this discussed explicitly anywhere. But it’s an excellent question. Of course, some of the groups “learned” of their Jewishness only later… This is definitely a great topic to explore!

  • Dcschwartz

    Re: genetic similarity between some Ethiopian Jews and some Yemenite Jews-

    I recall from my time studying Jewish history and genetics in college that there is some significant doubt as to Yemeni Jews’ genetic affiliation with the Jewish population as a whole.  Basically, the theory goes, Yemeni Jews converted at some point in the past, just as Ethiopian Jews are presumed to have done.

    If both of these groups converted at some point in the past, then neither has a genetic affiliation with the wider “genetic” Jewish body and a connection between these two groups would seem to be irrelevant to the discussion of either group’s genetic affiliation with “genetic” Jews.

    • http://www.pereltsvaig.com Asya Pereltsvaig

      As far as I know, Yemeni Jews have some Middle Eastern/Jewish DNA and some sub-Saharan African DNA (I am talking about Y-DNA here). Substantial gene flow from sub-Saharan Africa is not uncommon with certain non-Jewish, Arabic-speaking populations: Jordanians, Syrians, Iraqis, and Bedouins. I have written on this a while ago in my other blog:

      http://languagesoftheworld.info/geolinguistics/lost-tribes-in-africa-part-2.html

      But of course, “more research is needed”, as we scientists like to say.

  • Alfia Wallace

    While this is indeed fascinating, I have to wonder about the racial component of deciding exactly how Jewish any sub-Saharan African population is or isn’t.  Are non-black populations held to the same standard as whites when considering suitability for aliyah? Russians and Ukrainians who are barely “ethnically” Jewish, and religiously non-practicing (if even culturally Jewish at all) are being granted Israeli citizenship.  In the light of the current situation with the Sudanese in Israel, who are definitely not in any way Jewish, the post is indeed provocative.  Fascinating, but provocative.  

    I, too, would love to see a posts on the Khazars and on Jews in India.  

    • CelestialChoir

       You have raised several good questions. In the light of all the recent research on genetics and how this links populations, etc. , I consider anyone “Jewish” that shares the genetic material…regardless of choice of religious faith (or no faith),
      sociocultural connection or political “recognition” or lack thereof. As more populations of all kinds get their genes and chromosomes mapped, classified, linked and whatnot, I suspect that the “many nations” of Father Avraham have a much more extensive geno-geography than anyone previously thought! Genes is genes and chromosomes is chromosomes, and they have their own fascinating stories to tell about inheritance, relationship and the history of humans. If you have my genes and I have yours, we’re just genetic cousins! :-)

      • http://www.pereltsvaig.com Asya Pereltsvaig

        You are absolutely correct that genetic research reveals links between groups that we wouldn’t have known about without such research. However, relying solely on genetics to determine who is or isn’t Jewish doesn’t seem right to me either. As I mentioned in an earlier post (see link below), there’s no specific “Jewish genes” that all and only Jews share. Even CMH is found among non-Jewish groups, due to gene flow. This is why, to me, discovering genetic links (or the lack thereof) between African groups that I discussed in this post and other Jewish groups is interesting more as a trace of historical (or even prehistoric) connections than as a sign of Jewishness per se…

        http://geocurrents.info/place/europe/hungarys-rising-hyper-nationalist-jobbik-party-and-the-legacy-of-anti-semitism-and-anti-gypsyism

        • Alfia

          The Orthodox, who run the show on who is and isn’t Jewish for ritual observation (marriage, burial, etc.) in Israel, require being converted in the Orthodox tradition (if not “ethnically” Jewish) in order to qualify for Jewishness.  Those people obviously needn’t have any shared genetic material to qualify.  This is different from the qualifications for aliyah though, no?   I have met people in and from Israel who were not raised Jewish and who were half ethnically Jewish or less, who were allowed to emigrate to Israel.  Not to allow these people the benefit of marriage and burial in Israel when you let them in as Jews seems at cross-purposes. 

          I bring this up also in part because of my own situation.  My mother, according to Jewish law, is ethnically Jewish, although she was not raised Jewish (or any other religion).    Technically, this should make me Jewish, *but* I’m adopted.  My sister, who is not adopted, *is* ethnically Jewish?  It’s all very murky.  Interesting, but murky – and provocative! ;P

          • http://www.pereltsvaig.com Asya Pereltsvaig

            Alfia, thanks for sharing your personal story. Adoption does complicate matters, doesn’t it?

            But even without considering adoption, it’s a murky question, as you say. And I couldn’t agree more that “not to allow these people the benefit of marriage and burial in Israel when you let them in as Jews seems at cross-purposes” — well-said! As I mention in the post, the original formulation of the Law of Return has been extended to family members of Jews, even spouses of someone with just one Jewish grandparent. The original idea behind that was to provide a safe haven to people who would have been persecuted as Jewish under Nuremberg Laws, although some pundits see it as a tool to change the demographic  ituation in Israel… Whatever the explanation, a lot of people (especially from the former Soviet Union) fall into that murky category of being able to immigrate to Israel but not being considered Jewish for purposes of marriage, burial etc. The problem is that if they are not Christian or whatever, there is no civil solution to this, and a lot of Israelis—Jewish or otherwise—have a problem with that. The power that the Orthodox have in controlling such matters is another thing that irritates a lot of people, especially as the Orthodox are seen as not contributing enough to the country: not serving in the army, not paying taxes (and not working), drawing a lot of financial benefits because of large families, etc.

        • CelestialChoir

          Great food for thought, that raises a gazillion other questions….given that “there’s no specific “Jewish genes” that all and only Jews share”, and that the CMH is found also among “non-Jewish groups due to gene flow” (and it yet remains how many other
          groups share the CMH) then:

          1. How did the gene “flow out” and from whence is the original source, if not from
          the Cohanim/Levite ancestors? Assuming that Cohanim/Levites married “out” and spread the haplotype to other populations, that would still link those populations to some “original” Cohen/Levite “proto-ancestor” or group of “ancestors.”

          2. Given that this particular haplotype can be found among “non-Jewish” populations,
          (J.Heald’s assertions offer some intriguing data) then that would suggest that there
          are gentile Cohens/Levites” and/or mixed Jewish-Gentile Cohens/Levites. If in fact the haplotype can appear in diverse genetic lines, then we could expect to see this
          haplotype emerge in any population(s) that male Cohens/Levites happened to intermarry with and/or produce offspring with.

          3. The comparison with the “One Drop Rule” for African ancestry in the United States raises a host of issues and provides additional comparisons for analysis. The One Drop Rule was only created to determine who was and who was not eligible for
          slavery. It has its own weird permutations, that show up on all kinds of forms, including birth certificates. African-americans are an amalgam of African, European and Native American gene pools/lines/clusters,etc. The “logic” of the One Drop Rule also makes
          me European and Native American–and these contributions to my family tree are
          as recent as grandparent/great-grandparent. In their Not-Quite-Biologically-Informed-About-Genetics minds, the Feds have arbitrarily decided to assign African ancestry to
          anyone who is one-64th per cent African–except for North Africans, who can check
          “White” on any forms. regardless of any ancestry they have! I have had to explain
          this to Egyptian students, who could not understand why the “lady at the college told
          me to check white when I checked “Black” because–surprise!–Egypt is in Africa and “I am African!”

          4. However,in contradstinction to the Sloppy Illogical One Drop Rule, the Cohen Modal Haplotype is a unique, specific gene marker that links diverse groups or populations
          to Cohen/Levitical ancestry–and this seems to occur in diverse geographic regions.
          Its degree of specificity–even taking into account the “microsatellite” genetic materials
          recounted in J. Heald’s essay–would be more “substantial” proof of Jewish ancestry
          in the sense that this marker is not just found “everywhere” or in any and all “Jewish” or “gentile” populations. Which leads to the next question/conundrum…

          5. J. Heald’s essay suggests that Cohen/Levite genes could derive–and did derive–
          from sources “older” than the ancient Cohen/Levites families mentioned in biblical texts. Technically speaking, if the CMH did not originate exclusively with these
          Cohen/Levites, then perhaps the nomenclature “Cohen Modal Haplotype” should
          be changed to something else…

          “Things that make you go hmmmmmmm…..”

          • http://www.pereltsvaig.com Asya Pereltsvaig

            My point about gene flow is that some genes (for example, CMH) can get into an otherwise distinct population. Don’t forget that Y-DNA represents only one out of two parents, only one of four grandparents, only one of eight great-grandparents, etc.

    • http://www.pereltsvaig.com Asya Pereltsvaig

      Alfia, thanks for sharing your thoughts! I am definitely adding Khazars and Jews of India to my list of topics to write on.

      The bigger point that you raise—whether genetic, cultural, religious, or some other aspect of Jewishness should count (more than others)—is indeed provocative. And there seems to be as many opinions, official or privately held, as there are people expressing them. I wonder what you have in mind when you talk of “Russians and Ukrainians who are barely “ethnically” Jewish”? But I can say from personal experience that “white” Jews are often subjected to as close scrutinity in Israel, as far as their “Jewishness” is concerned. I, for example, had to pass a rather thorough “exam” to prove that I am Jewish. I know many people who are Jewish but weren’t able to prove it to rabbinical court’s satisfaction. None of them are black either… The biggest problem in Israel is with people who cannot prove that they are Jewish but who are not Christian, Muslim, or something else (that is if they consider themselves Jewish but the rabbinical courts do not consider them as such): they can’t get married, divorced, or burried properly. It’s been a big problem, especially with people who were killed in the military or murdered in terrorist attacks, but can’t be burried in appropriate cemeteries.

      As for the Sudanese in Israel, they are indeed not Jewish in any way and do not pretend to be, so the question with them is not whether they are Jewish but what their status should be given that they are not Jewish nor are legally in the country.

      • Frank

        My brother, we must stop trying to get the approval of our oppressor to authenticate our existence. It is the so called european jew that calls themselves as Ashkenazi jews, by the way are the grandchildren of Japheth. You know the first born of Noah. Yeah, that son has no part in the genealogy of the Nation of Israel. They are from the “Khazar Empire, a major but almost forgotten power in Eastern Europe, which in the Dark Ages became converted to Judaism.” So whatever they do have they have only acquired ( stolen ) from real tribes of Israel, i.e. The Beta Israel, Lemba, The Ethiopian Jews etc…. And thats including DNA.

        • http://www.pereltsvaig.com Asya Pereltsvaig

          I am afraid the Khazar theory which you advocate does not hold water, when it comes to objective, scientific consideration of the matter. We are not interested in politicized or ideological debates on this site (please refer to Commenting Guidelines above; additional messages in this vein will be deleted).

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/James-T-Wilson/682045086 James T. Wilson

    In many ways, the post reminds me of the discussion months ago of membership in various American Indian [tribes, nations, whatever they are currently called].  When group membership is defined by a lex sanguinis (only partially, in the case of Judaism), all kinds of complications ensue, don’t they.

    • http://www.pereltsvaig.com Asya Pereltsvaig

      Thanks for sharing this story, Jim!

      As for your thought about our old discussion about American Indians, yes, it’s very similar, isn’t it? But with Judaism being one of the older, tribal-based religions such concerns/complications about blood-relatedness are inevitable, aren’t they?

  • Pingback: [BLOG] Some Friday links « A Bit More Detail

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/A3QWSXGGMUKHBJHMQ5XHSPTY44 Peter

    One way to get around the “who is Jewish” issue would be to adopt America’s One Drop Rule for determining who is black, and include everyone who has even the tiniest amount of Jewish ancestry or just thinks that he or she does.  Of course this would create its own set of problems.

    • http://www.pereltsvaig.com Asya Pereltsvaig

      Indeed it would. Not least because it (like the current definition) would push the question up the genealogical tree: instead of figuring one if a person is Jewish we’d be figuring out if any of his/her many ancestors are. Not to mention the possible abuses that such a definition would open a door to.

    • CelestialChoir

      This brings forth a chuckle for me…LOL….as an African-american who “”lives” the One Drop Rule”.
      I can tell you that the adoption of this rule to determine Jewish ancestry would result in a massive
      “re-alignment/re-configuration” of every identity marker known to humanity. This discussion would involve the Molecular Geneticists vs. the Ethnographers vs. the Sociopolitical Society vs. the Halachic Cadres vs. the Denominationalists (all flavors) vs. the Political Pundits vs. the  Non-denominationalists
      (all flavors) vs. the Generic Worshipers vs. the Matrilinial-Descent Mavens vs. the Patrilinial-Descent Mavens vs. the Omni-lineal Descent Crowd vs. the Ethnocultural Cabal vs. the Genetic Attorneys vs. the Non-Profit Associations for the Defense of Ancestry vs. the Politically-Aligned Genetic Testing Laboratories vs. the Strictly-for-Profit Non-Politically-Aligned Genetic Testing Laboratories vs. the
      Non-Profit Non-Religious All-Purpose Genetic Testing Service vs. the Government-Approved
      Ancestry-Testing Service and Certification Office vs. the Plain Old Humans trying to live a decent life and figure everything out……..Shalom, y’all! :-)

      • http://www.pereltsvaig.com Asya Pereltsvaig

        Whether the “one drop rule” is justified for African-Americans or not, applying it to determining all group identification would lead to a problem that most people would be in many (if not all) groups.

  • Pingback: Click now

  • michael

    please no essays but are Caribbeans have ancestry from isreal

    • Eliyahu_ben_Yehoshua7

      YES. I know many Jamaicans that are Jews. During Inquisition, many Spanish Jews fled to the Caribbean, especially Jamaica, which has one of the oldest, if not the oldest shuls in the Caribbean also, many German Jews settled in the Caribbean. This only means that some Caribbean people may have traces of Jewish lineage but as time progressed such gene pools may have been vanquished due to intermarriage and other means of amalgamation.

      • http://www.pereltsvaig.com Asya Pereltsvaig

        Thanks for sharing this, Eliyahu

    • http://www.facebook.com/sheldon.bobb Sheldon Bobb

      Afro west indians hail mostly from the Igbo and yuroba of ashanti Ghana two groups of people with historical and genetic ties to the ancient Judeans that fled Jerusalem in 70 AD

      • http://www.facebook.com/sheldon.bobb Sheldon Bobb

        And has Hebrew genes of there own that is not dependant on intermingling with Sephardic European jews.

        • http://www.pereltsvaig.com Asya Pereltsvaig

          “Hebrew genes”? Is there such a thing? What about “English genes”, “Arabic genes”, “Spanish genes”???

  • Frank

    Let me say this to this viewing audience, those who are of the leadership of the State of Israel, are not the author and finisher of the 12 Tribes of Israel. Therefore, we who are of the Biblical description of the (Black) Hebrew Israelites which all 12 tribes are black, { Deuteronomy 28: 15 – 68} do not need the approval of the so called Jewish leadership of Israel, who are not jews by ancestry, but are Khazars from the Khazar Epmire. Revelation 2:9 & Rev 3: 7-9. Check out what their own researchers have found out, i.e. Professor Shlomo Sand of the University of Tel Aviv, and Arthur Koestler.

  • me!

    Of course they are. What kind of eugenics/Nazi way of determining jewishness is this?? So does this article imply that everyone has to genetically justify his inclusion in any specific religious or ethnic group? How sad.

    • http://www.pereltsvaig.com Asya Pereltsvaig

      The title is meant to be provocative, but as you can see from the actual post, who is Jewish is a very complicated question (which even the Nazis didn’t have a simplistic answer too, as the Karaim controversy revealed). Genetic relatedness to other Jews, religious conversion, cultural traditions—all can be seen as Jewishness. Some (if not all) of these are difficult to take into the legal domain, so the issue remains highly problematic. Nothing sad about that complexity though…