Recent Focused Series »

Siberia
Northern California
The Caucasus
Imaginary Geography

Demic Atlas
Home » Economic Geography, Geopolitics, Islands, Latin America

Argentina’s Claims to the Falkland Islands, and Much More

Written by on February 24, 2010 6 Comments |  
Share submit to reddit


The Falkland Islands, known in Spanish as the Malvinas, are back in the news, as Argentina reasserts its claims while objecting to offshore oil exploration in the vicinity by British firms. In 1982 the Falklands made global headlines when Argentina unsuccessfully attempted to militarily wrest control of the archipelago from the United Kingdom. In the intervening years, Britain beefed up its military presence on the islands, granted full British citizenship to their residents, and endeavored to diversify the economy. The 3,000 or so Falkland Islanders, English-speaking settlers nicknamed “kelpers” after the local seaweed beds, now profit from the massive export of squid, mostly to Spain. If oil exploration pays off, significantly higher revenues could follow.

After losing the Falkland War, Argentina underwent a political transformation as its discredited military government yielded to civilian rule. Although it subsequently reestablished diplomatic recognition with Britain, Buenos Aires never dropped its claim to the islands, which it views as inalienable Argentine territory. War with the U.K. is not a current possibility, but Argentina does want to make continued British political control and economic exploitation as diplomatically uncomfortable as possible. On February 24, 2010, The Wall Street Journal noted that a summit of 32 Latin American and Caribbean countries had expressed “moral support” for the Argentine claim, while calling for high-level talks on the disputed sovereignty. The same summit also laid the foundation for a new regional organization, The Community of Latin American and Caribbean States, that could continue to pressure the United Kingdom over its disputed control of the archipelago.

Historically speaking, sovereignty over the Falklands is a complex matter. Since 1762, actual control has shifted between Britain, France, Spain, and Argentina – with a brief U.S. foray into the region in 1831. By 1834, Britain was in firm possession. Argentine nationalists, however, have never wavered in their demands. Often overlooked is the fact that these demands extend well beyond the Falklands/Malvinas themselves. Argentina also claims sovereignty over a number of other British-controlled sub-Antarctic islands, including South Georgia and the South Sandwich islands. While none of these islands is permanently inhabited, they do include non-trivial land areas as well as large swaths of sea-space. The potential resource base of the combined area is substantial, raising the stakes of the current conflict.

Related Posts

    The Marshall Islands and the U.S.
    The Andaman Islands: Cultural Extinction, Paleolithic Survival, and Modern Naval Warfare
    The Finances of Man

Subscribe For Updates

It would be a pleasure to have you back on GeoCurrents in the future. We publish new articles every weekday, and you can follow our RSS Feed, Facebook, or Twitter for notifications of each new post:
      
Previous Post
«
| Next Post
»

Commenting Guidelines: GeoCurrents is a forum for the respectful exchange of ideas, and loaded political commentary can detract from that. We ask that you as a reader keep this in mind when sharing your thoughts in the comments below.

  • Asya

    We've visited Argentina a couple of years ago and felt from our conversations with the locals that the subject of the Faulklands/Malvinas is VERY touchy for them. But I think it goes back further, to the early 20th century, when Argentina was a big agricultural producer and the British were interested in building infrastructure there, including railroads and the Retiro train station in Buenos-Aires (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/7d/Estacion-Retiro-v2.jpg): the steel construction pieces for the main hall were shipped to Buenos-Aires from Liverpool. The British even built the Clock Tower (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8c/Torre_Monumental_(Buenos_Aires).jpg) to commemorate the completion of the railroad construction. But despite (or perhaps because of?) the British investments, Argentinians felt as if they were exploited by the British. The Faulklands War only brought some of these negative feelings to the surface. There was a big renaming campaign: for example, the British Clock Tower was renamed Torre Monumental. And ironically, the Falklands War Memorial (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/65/Malvinaswarmemorialbbaa217.jpg) is just across the street from the Clock Tower, as a grim reminder of the Argentina-Britain tension.

  • Connie B.

    Argentina has no credible claim to the Falklands. If Argentina can lay claim to land they never inhabited for any substantial length of time, then Mexico can reclaim the Southwestern US, and Britain can reclaim the US.

    If Argentina strong arms their way to eventual ownership and control of the Falklands, every country that backed them, especially the United States, should hang their head in shame. It’s pure thievery.

  • http://GeoCurrents.info Martin W. Lewis

    Connie B. may be correct — I have not examined the issue in enough detail to know whether Argentina’s claims have any credibility. It would, moreover, be difficult to establish a metric for the credibility of territorial claims. As a result, all that I can do is outline the disputes that do exist, without making judgements on their validity. If Mexico were to advance claims on the southwest USA, then I would report that as well. But I can say that the residents of the Falkland Islands overwhelming support British claims and reject Argentina’s position. Therefore, if one puts local sentiments first, one would have to support Britain’s position. When it comes to South Georgia Islands and the South Sandwich Islands, however, there are no permanent local inhabitants to consider. The main point of the post was actually to show that Argentina demands much more than the Falkland Islands.

  • http://www.britishargentina.com Yosef

    If British soldiers had managed to conquer Buenos Aires in 1806 or 1807, then not only would present-day Argentina and Uruguay had submitted to British control (and develop like Canada or Australia/NZ), but the Falklands and S. Georgia/S. Sandwich would indisputably be in Argentine territory!!!

  • Dave Howard

    When I was young I lived in Argentina and learned to speak their language and understand some of their culture. Later in life, after the war, I visited the Falklands and toured the landscape and talked with the people. I have read some Falkland islanders’ accounts of the war with Argentina.

    First of all my impression is the Falkland Islanders who live there today are British. English is their mother tongue. Many are descended from residents of Scotland with similar terrain and weather. 

    I did find an Argentine restaurant in Stanley. The Argentinians there spoke good English and were trying to fit in with the local culture.

    The Argentine Generals running the country in the 1970s started to lose control due to the Mothers of the Plaza de Mayo protesting the loss of their desaparecidos children. The generals countered and redirected the public attention to the Falklands. Signs appeared everywhere in the country “Las Malvinas son Argentinas.” They were in the subways, they were on the sides of buses and airplanes, billboards, and sign posts on highways.

    Perhaps the UK ripped off Argentina in 1833 to get possession of the area. My guess is that at a time when oil and fishing were not such important issues the UK might have given the territory back if Argentina had asked nicely.

    By the way - 

    The Falklands have some amazing stone runs I had never seen before in my life. Here is a link to a photo http://www.sciencephoto.com/media/135275/enlarge  

Tags: ,